IN WATCHING the flow of events over the past decade or so, it is hard to avoid the feeling that something very fundamental has happened in world history. březen Před patnácti lety jsem ve své knize Konec dějin a poslední člověk prohlásil, že chce-li být společnost moderní, neexistuje alternativa k tržnímu. Francis Fukuyama a Samuel Huntington (Konec dějin nebo střet civilizací?) že se nacházíme na konci dějin v důsledku vítězství liberální demokracie jako.
|Published (Last):||13 January 2017|
|PDF File Size:||7.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.98 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
China could not now be described in any way as a liberal democracy. This is not to deny the role of material factors as such. Hegel’s view of the relationship between the ideal and the real or material worlds fukuymaa an extremely complicated one, beginning with the fact that for him the distinction between the two was only apparent.
This is, of vejin, a convenient point of view for people who want to dejln that something major is changing in the Soviet Union, but do not want to accept responsibility for recommending the radical policy redirection implicit in such a view. Indeed, if the bulk of the present economic reform proposals were put into effect, it is hard to know how the Soviet economy would be more socialist than those of other Western countries with large public sectors.
Such nostalgia, in fact, will continue to fuel competition and conflict even in the post-historical world for some time to come.
Dejinn considered the challenge of China and Russia to be the major threat, since they could pose a viable rival model which could inspire other states. It is easy to forget as well how momentous the outcome of Asian ideological struggles seemed for world political development as a whole. But Gorbachev’s tactical requirements should not blind us to the fact that the democratizing and decentralizing principles which he has enunciated in both the economic and political spheres are highly subversive of some of the most fundamental precepts of both Fujuyama and Leninism.
What is important from a Hegelian standpoint is that political liberalism has been following economic liberalism, more slowly than many had hoped but with seeming inevitability. For the way in which any state defines its national interest is not universal but rests on some kind of prior ideological basis, tukuyama as we saw that economic behavior is determined by a prior state of consciousness.
Consciousness is cause and not effect, and can develop autonomously from the material world; hence the real subtext underlying the apparent jumble of current events is the history of ideology.
The internal politics of the Byzantine Empire at the time of Justinian revolved around a conflict between the so-called monophysites and monothelites, who believed that the unity of the Holy Trinity was alternatively one of nature or of will. The Soviet Union could in no way be described as a liberal or democratic country now, nor do I think that it is terribly likely that perestroika will succeed such that the label will be thinkable any time in the near future. But there are powerful reasons for believing that it is the ideal that will govern the material world in the long run.
While it is impossible to rule out the sudden appearance of new ideologies or previously unrecognized contradictions in liberal societies, then, the present world seems to confirm that the fundamental principles of sociopolitical organization have not advanced terribly far since Many of the wars and revolutions fought since that time have been undertaken in the name of ideologies which claimed to be more advanced than liberalism, but whose pretensions were ultimately unmasked by history.
But the former is explained by commercial motives and the latter is a vestige of earlier ideologically-based rivalries. Works by Francis Fukuyama. This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor’s personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.
Indeed, Hegel the professor was temporarily thrown out of work as a result of a very material event, the Battle of Jena. In the meantime, they have helped to spread the universal homogenous state to the point where it could have a significant effect on the overall character of international relations. And I think they clearly can. By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions. Obviously, this is true on some level: What is important about China from the standpoint of world history is not the present state of the reform or even its future prospects.
What destroyed fascism as an idea was not universal moral revulsion against it, since plenty of people were willing to endorse the idea as long as it seemed the wave of the future, but its lack of success.
In the first place, nationalism is not one single phenomenon but several, ranging from mild cultural nostalgia to the highly organized and elaborately articulated doctrine of National Socialism. The conservative opposition in the USSR, consisting both of simple workers afraid of unemployment and inflation and of party officials fearful of losing their jobs and privileges, is outspoken and may be strong enough to force Gorbachev’s ouster in the next few years.
The End of History and the Last Man – Wikipedia
Or put another way, are there contradictions in liberal society beyond that of class that are not resolvable? Theses on a related topic List of theses with an identical keyword. And in that respect, it is clear that an astounding transformation has occurred.
Gorbachev’s claim that he is seeking to return to the true Lenin is perfectly easy to understand: But it is not clear that nationalism rep resents an irreconcilable contradiction in the heart of liberalism.
Konec dějin a poslední člověk
Fascism was destroyed as a living ideology by World War II. A recent example of this is Paul Kennedy’s hugely successful The Rise and Fall of the Great Powerswhich ascribes the decline of great powers to simple economic overextension.
Email required Password required Remember me? In fact, the notion that ideology is a superstructure imposed on a substratum of permanent great power interest is a highly questionable proposition. FAILURE to fukuyana that the roots of economic behavior lie in the realm of consciousness and culture leads to the common mistake of attributing material causes to phenomena that are essentially ideal in nature.
Surely the most remarkable changes have occurred in Asia. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.
Nevertheless, he expressed his continued belief that “the power of the democratic ideal remains immense. This is most evident in the economic sphere, where the reform economists around Gorbachev have become steadily more radical in their support for free markets, to the point where some like Nikolai Shmelev do not mind being compared in public to Milton Friedman.
One is inclined to say that the revival of religion in some way attests to a broad unhappiness with the impersonality and spiritual vacuity of koec consumerist societies. Economic Statistics do not begin to describe the dynamism, initiative, and openness evident in China since the reform began. But large-scale conflict must involve large states still caught in the grip of history, and they are what appear to be passing from the scene.
It took European colonial powers like France several years after the war to admit the illegitimacy of their empires, but decolonialization was an inevitable consequence of the Allied victory which had been based on the promise of a restoration fuuyama democratic freedoms. The former[ 11 ] saw the political weakness, materialism, anomie, and lack of community of the West as fundamental contradictions in liberal societies that could only be resolved by a strong state that forged a new “people” on the basis of national exclusiveness.
Please provide more details about your request. The vast majority of the world’s nationalist movements do not have a political program beyond the negative desire of independence from some other group or people, and do not offer anything like a comprehensive agenda for socio-economic organization.
For more information go to: Clearly, the vast bulk of the Third World remains very much mired in history, and will be a terrain of conflict for many years to come. While almost anyone would look good compared to Stalin, drawing so sharp a line between Lenin and his successor is questionable.
In fact, modern economists, recognizing gukuyama man does not always behave as a profit -maximizer, posit a “utility” function, utility being either income or some other good that can be maximized: